Pre-Treatment Studies on Various Wood Types with High-Performance Light Stabilizers
Summary
Lignin (wood component) degrades readily when exposed to sunlight. To preserve wood appearance, water-based clear coatings containing UV absorbers and light stabilizers are commonly applied to surfaces for protection. However, the benefit of such application is limited. According to our studies, subjecting the wood surface to pretreatment before applying a clear topcoat can effectively enhance protection of lignin against UV degradation. Eversorb® AQ, a product combining UV absorber and HALS, is manufactured by Everlight Chemical Industrial Corporation (ECIC) specifically for water-based clear coatings. Eversorb® SB, produced for wood pretreatments, can protect lignin from the effects of UV light. The wood protection efficacy factor for Eversorb® AQ is 14.69%. The wood protection efficacy factor for Eversorb® SB was determined to be 13.35%. Eversorb® AQ and Eversorb® SB exhibit synergistic interaction. The efficacy factor is 10.09%. Both Eversorb® AQ and Eversorb® SB are products with good performance for wood protection. This article is a comparative study using accelerated weathering method to test different wood types treated with Eversorb® SB previously or differently in different solvents. Design of Experiments (DOE) was used in this study. The data confirm that treatment with Eversorb® SB demonstrates better performance in UV effect testing. Lignin is a complex organic polymer containing hydroxyl functional groups (-OH). Two types of auxiliary solvents, isopropyl alcohol and butyl carbitol, were tested in the system with solubility parameters of 11.5 and 9.9 respectively. After degradation testing, Eversorb® SB mixed with isopropyl alcohol yielded better results than for butyl carbitol. Because softwoods contain higher lignin content (25–35%) than hardwoods (18–25%), theoretically, Eversorb® SB pretreatment can provide better protection to softwoods. Our data support the hypothesis; pretreatment with Eversorb® SB provides much greater protection on softwoods (Southern Pine and Douglas Fir) than on hardwoods (Cedar, Southern Birch and African Teak).Introduction
Water-based clear coatings were developed to address the high VOC issues typically associated with traditional solvent-based coatings [1]. Most customers use water-based clear wood coatings to protect wood materials. However, sunlight and UV radiation can penetrate coatings on wood surfaces causing yellowing. Yellowing results from both the coating and lignin. Wood begins to yellow due to photodegradation of lignin, which is a combination of lignin, cellulose and hemicellulose [2-6].The photodegradation pathway of lignin [7-8] is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Photodegradation pathway of lignin
Eversorb® AQ is a water-based light stabilizer. Eversorb® SB is a lignin stabilizer designed for wood pretreatments. Test data confirmed that increasing Eversorb® AQ concentration in the clear topcoat can effectively protect Southern Pine from UV light degradation. Other experiments show that pretreatment of Southern Pine with Eversorb® SB before clear topcoat application provides better weathering resistance than without Eversorb® SB pretreatment. Additionally, the data suggest that by increasing coating thickness, light fastness of Southern Pine can be improved to some extent, but increasing the dosage of light stabilizers in clear coating or pretreating southern pine before varnish application are more effective methods [9]. Lignin is a complex organic polymer containing hydroxyl functional groups (-OH). To check whether solvents affect the protection performance of Eversorb® SB, different auxiliary solvents were used in the experiment to mix with Eversorb® SB. Theoretically, Eversorb® SB pretreatment could have better performance on softwoods than hardwoods due to high lignin content. While softwoods contain 25–35% lignin, hardwoods contain 18–25% lignin [10]. The subject of this paper covers five different wood types including softwoods (Southern Pine and Douglas Fir) and hardwoods (Cedar, Southern Birch and African Teak).Experiment
Three model formulations were used in this study: acrylic-based water-based clear coating, wood pretreatments and auxiliary solvents. Detailed compositions are shown in Tables 1, 2 and 3. Five different wood types were selected in the region as shown in Figure 2. Design of Experiments (DOE) was used to design test studies and analyze test data. The DOE technique enabled us to validate the data.Table 1. Composition of water-based model formulation
Table 2. Wood pretreatment model formulations
Table 3. Solubility parameters of different auxiliary solvents (Unit: (cal/cm3)1/2)
Screening Design of Different Wood Types and Auxiliary Solvents Using EV-AQ and EV-SB
A screening design (Table 4) was used to identify factors providing minimum color change after degradation testing. The mathematical model derived from the data shows all factors – X1: 5 different wood types (Cedar, Douglas Fir, Southern Birch, African Teak and Southern Pine). X2: 3 types of application (X2-1: Topcoat: Water-Based Acrylic Resin, X2-2: Wood Pretreatment: Butyl Carbitol mixed with EV-SB, Topcoat: Acrylic Resin mixed with EV-AQ and X2-3: Wood Pretreatment: IPA mixed with EV-SB, Topcoat: Acrylic Resin mixed with EV-AQ).Figure 2. Different wood types
Table 4. Screening design details and test resultsOptimal Prediction Profiler
The prediction profile (for example, Southern Pine) shows the effect of 3 types of treatments after 300 hours of weathering test. For the sample using only water-based acrylic resin, yellowing is significant after degradation testing. (Color difference ΔE=31.85) (as shown in Figure 3). 10% EV-SB in pretreatment mixed with Butyl Carbitol and 2% EV-AQ in topcoat. Performance was better than untreated with UV. (Color difference ΔE=10.25) (Figure 4). 10% EV-SB mixed with IPA in pretreatment and 2% EV-AQ in topcoat. Southern Pine showed the best light fastness. (Color difference ΔE=6.55) (Figure 5). Photographs of different wood types after degradation testing are shown in Figures 6 through 10.Figure 3. Effect of Southern Pine coated with acrylic resin after 300 hours of weathering
Figure 4. Effect of Southern Pine and pretreatments with butyl carbitol after 300 hours of weathering (Prediction Profiler)
Figure 5. Effect of Southern Pine and pretreatments with IPA after 300 hours of weathering (Prediction Profiler)
Figure 6. Photo of Douglas Fir after testing for 300 hours
Figure 7. Photo of African Teak after degradation testing for 300 hours
Figure 8. Photo of Southern Birch after degradation testing for 300 hours
Figure 9. Photo of Southern Pine after weathering test for 300hrs
Figure 10. Photo of Cedar after degradation testing for 300 hours








